Legal Opinion

Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 13, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00275Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF : CALIFORNIA, INC., : Plaintiff, v. : C.A. No. 17-275-LPS-CJB : C.A. No. 17-1353-LPS-CJB OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. : and OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, — : LTD., : Defendants, _ MEMORANDUM ORDER Having presided over trial in this matter between March 9 and March 18, 2020, having heard extensive oral argument on July 28, 2020, and having provided the parties with a bench ruling on July 30, 2020, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1, Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.’s (“PacBio” or “Plaintiff’) motions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API