Legal Opinion
In Re Amy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2009No. 09-41238PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, proceeding under the pseudonym “Amy,” seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to enter an order requiring defendant Doyle Randall Paroline (“Paroline”) to pay victim restitution to her in the amount of $3,367,854. Alternatively, petitioner asks us to remand this case to the district court for reconsideration of its order declining to impose restitution against Paroline. Because the district court’s conclusion1 that the government failed to establish that any of the defendant’s conduct related to this offense proximately caused Amy’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Richard C. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Doe, United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re DeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ParolineDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Doyle ParolineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Amy UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.