In Re Dean
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In the related criminal proceeding, twelve of the victims asked the district court to reject the plea agreement, alleging violations of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. The district court denied the request. See United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893 (S.D.Tex. Feb. 21, 2008). The victims petition for writ of mandamus with the prayer that “[t]he decision of the district court should be reversed and the case remanded with instructions that the plea agreement [not be] accepted and the parties are permitted to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re AntrobusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by60 opinions
- In re JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- LRM v. KastenbergCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- In re: Courtney WildCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- In Re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.