Legal Opinion

United States v. Paroline

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 7, 2009No. 4:08-cv-00061PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Request for Restitution by Amy, 1 who is a victim in the “Misty” child pornography series. 2 Defendant Doyle Randall Paroline (“Paroline”) unlawfully possessed two pornographic images of Amy he obtained over the Internet. Having considered the parties’ oral arguments and written submissions, and for the reasons explained below, the Government has not met its burden of proving what losses, if any, were proximately caused by Paroline’s possession of Amy’s two pornographic images and thus, the Request for Restitution…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Doyle ParolineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. In Re AmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Amy UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API