Legal Opinion

United States v. Amy Unknown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2011No. 09-41238, 09-41254PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: 1

“Amy,” the victim of childhood sexual abuse and of a widely broadcast set of photos depicting her abuse, has pursued restitution under the Crime Victims Rights’ Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(6), against defendants who viewed her photos on the internet. Her appeal from the district court’s denial of relief arrives in an unusual posture. She filed both a direct appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and a petition for a writ of mandamus under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). A panel of this court denied mandamus. In re Amy, 591 F.3d 792 (5th Cir.2009). This panel was assigned,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. AumaisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Nathaniel WordenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API