United States v. Amy Unknown
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: 1
“Amy,” the victim of childhood sexual abuse and of a widely broadcast set of photos depicting her abuse, has pursued restitution under the Crime Victims Rights’ Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(6), against defendants who viewed her photos on the internet. Her appeal from the district court’s denial of relief arrives in an unusual posture. She filed both a direct appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and a petition for a writ of mandamus under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). A panel of this court denied mandamus. In re Amy, 591 F.3d 792 (5th Cir.2009). This panel was assigned,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AumaisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Nathaniel WordenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.