Legal Opinion

Paroline v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 23, 2014No. 12-8561PublishedCited by 461 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

*439This case presents the question of how to determine the amount of restitution a possessor of child pornography must pay to the victim whose childhood abuse appears in the pornographic materials possessed. The relevant statutory provisions are set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2259. Enacted as a component of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, § 2259 requires district courts to award restitution for certain federal criminal offenses, including child-pornography possession.

Petitioner Doyle Randall Paroline pleaded guilty to such an offense. He admitted to possessing between 150 and 300 images of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by461 opinions

  1. People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. County of Los Angeles v. MendezSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Facebook, Inc. v. DuguidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

456 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API