United States v. Monzel
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
In December 2009, respondent Michael Monzel pled guilty to possession of child pornography. One of the images he possessed depicted the petitioner, who proceeds in this matter under the pseudonym “Amy.” Amy subsequently sought $3,263,758 in restitution from Monzel. The district court, however, awarded what it called “nominal” restitution of $5000, an amount it acknowledged was less than the harm Monzel caused her. Amy challenges the award in a petition for mandamus and by direct appeal. We grant her petition in part…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- American Hospital Association v. Sylvia BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Northeast Hospital Corp. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.