Legal Opinion
City of Akron v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1966No. Nos. 39381 and 39385PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Two matters decided by the commission preliminary to the hearing on the merits are assigned as error by the appellants.
The first of these concerns the overruling on August 28, 1961, of the motion by Akron, Cleveland and Massillon that the company’s application be dismissed as prematurely filed.
The second concerns the preliminary order approving a random-sampling plan proposed by the company as one means of preparing evidence to be presented as to depreciation of the company’s pipe, a large part of its inventory.
•• Although specifically assigned as error, the overruling of the first of these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Marietta v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.