Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. 29218PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.

The question presented to this court is-whether the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the-demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition. More specifically, the question may be stated as follows: Granting that all the facts stated in plaintiff’s amended petition are true, was the Court of Appeals required to-issue a writ of mandamus to the trial court in plaintiff’s personal injury suit, requiring that court to vacate and set aside its order theretofore made staying-the proceedings in the personal injury action for the-period during which William E. Pollock is actively engaged in the military…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leinbach v. Pickwick-Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Norton v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Vaughn v. CharpiotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Elliott v. LawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cohn v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Semler v. OertwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Wallace v. TyackOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API