State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.
The question presented to this court is-whether the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the-demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition. More specifically, the question may be stated as follows: Granting that all the facts stated in plaintiff’s amended petition are true, was the Court of Appeals required to-issue a writ of mandamus to the trial court in plaintiff’s personal injury suit, requiring that court to vacate and set aside its order theretofore made staying-the proceedings in the personal injury action for the-period during which William E. Pollock is actively engaged in the military…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leinbach v. Pickwick-Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Norton v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Vaughn v. CharpiotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Elliott v. LawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Cohn v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by51 opinions
- Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Semler v. OertwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State ex rel. Wallace v. TyackOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.