Legal Opinion
East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1938No. Consolidated 26478PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
In this state the sole method of review from an order of the Public Utilities Commission is by an appeal to this court. New evidence is not adduced upon the appeal, but this court considers the law and facts upon the record made before the commission. Under such circumstances, it is essential that the Public Utilities Commission conduct a fair and open hearing with suitable opportunity being given through evidence and argument to challenge the result found by the commission. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 294 U. S., 63, 79, 79 L. Ed., 761, 773, 55 S. Ct., 316, 324; Ohio…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- United Gas Corp. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.