Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 21, 1976No. 39PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*330EXUM, Justice.
In conjunction with a pending application for a general rate increase filed October 29, 1973, the utility on January 25, 1974, applied to the Commission for approval of the utility’s use as an adjunct, or rider, to its regular rate schedules a fuel adjustment clause. On February 5, 1974, the Commission on the basis of the utility’s application and before hearing entered an ex parte order permitting the utility to use the fuel adjustment clause on an interim basis pending a hearing and final determination. The Commission, after full hearing, entered on December 19, 1974, its…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, Richmond Power and Light of the City of Richmond, Indiana,intervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Norfolk v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Scates v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Conservation CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.