Legal Opinion
Bell v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 29, 1989No. 89-35VPublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l—300aa-33 (Supp. V. 1987), this matter comes before the court on the basis of the Report and Recommendation filed on November 2, 1989, by Special Master Elizabeth E. Wright.
Neither party has filed any objection to the Special Master’s findings or conclusions of law, and the time to so file has expired.
The Special Master’s Report and Recommendation, including her recommended findings and conclusions of law, is adopted by the court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(2)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- National Association of Concerned Veterans, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Secretary of Defense, Appellants/cross-Appellees. Mark Green and Corporate Accountability Research Group v. Department of Commerce, Beverly L. B. Parker v. Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Guy v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Rupert ex rel. Rupert v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Carraggio v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Avera v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.