Legal Opinion
Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 14, 2016No. 11-654VPublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorneys’ fees and costs in a vaccine case; lodestar approach applied to local rates for fees in Louisiana and Arkansas; reduction for attorneys’ time spent on paralegal and administrative tasks; reasonable rates for medical experts; documentation of costs
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
Kevin and Heather Raymo, acting on behalf of their minor child, H.T.R., and through their attorneys, request that this court review the chief special master’s decision awarding attorneys’ fees and costs. See Pet’rs’ Mem. of Objs. in Support of Mot. for Review (“Pet’rs’ Mem.”), ECF No. 125-1. The ease was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Abeyta v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Allard v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Allard v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.