Legal Opinion

Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 26, 1984No. 118-81LPublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This case arises under section 5(a) of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act of 1978 (BWCAW Act), Pub.L. No. 95-495, 92 Stat. 1649, which provides that owners of resorts located on land riparian to certain lakes in Minnesota may require the United States Government to purchase their properties. The plaintiff is the owner of a resort qualified for purchase by the Government. On October 27, 1978, the plaintiff properly notified the United States Forest Service that it wished to invoke the buy-out provision of the BWCAW Act. Thereafter, the Forest Service commissioned…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Bell v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Hedstrom Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Childers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API