Guy v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
In this vaccine case, petitioners seek review of the special master’s February 26, 1997 decision on attorneys’ fees and costs, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Vaccine Program), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq (1994). For the reasons set forth below, review is granted in part and denied in part. The court upholds the special master’s award of $36,732.00 in attorneys’ fees, but modifies upward the amount allowed for costs to $23,105.03.
BACKGROUND
On November 10, 1992, petitioners sought compensation under the Vaccine Program for injury to their minor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Carl J. Perreira and Christina J. Perreira, Parents and Next Friend of Carly C. Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Sabella v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Savin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Rodriguez ex rel. Estate of Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Joan Caves v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Morse v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.