Legal Opinion
Edgar v. Citraro
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. 6865PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Two automobiles driven respectively by the defendants Frank Citraro and C. D. Pratt collided at the intersection of Julian and" Fifth Streets in San Jose about 8 o’clock in the evening. Riding with Citraro at the time were Mrs. Rose Edgar, her minor children Florence and John, and her sister, Mrs. Frances P. Traylen, all of whom were more or less injured. Five actions for damages grew out of the accident. Four were instituted by the injured parties, and the fifth by the parents of Florence Edgar to recover the damages they claimed to have sustained on account of the injuries to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PeakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Traylen v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hartman v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Edgar v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Fitzpatrick v. HaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.