Legal Opinion

People v. Peak

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1944No. Crim. 2298PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

The appellant, George Peak, shot and seriously wounded his daughter Jane Epidendio and her husband Ernest Epidendio with a shotgun during a family dispute over the attempted removal by the Epidendios of certain furniture and personal belongings of which they were the owners from a dwelling owned by Ernest Epidendio and in which appellant was then living. There was but one shot fired, and appellant was charged in one indictment, containing two counts, with violating section 245 of the Penal Code—assault with a deadly weapon. He was found guilty by a jury on each count and he appeals from the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Munson v. MunsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API