Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1921No. S. F. No. 9463. S. F. No. 9465PublishedCited by 42 opinions

The facts are stated in the, opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J.,

pro tem. These two actions arose out of injuries received by the plaintiff in each through the overturning of a taxicab of the defendants while the plaintiffs were passengers therein. The accident occurred in the city of San Francisco at an early hour in the morning of January 1, 1919. The defendants were at the time co-partners, owning and operating through their employees certain taxicabs for hire within said city. The plaintiffs, with other members of their family and friends, the party numbering seven in all, entered one of these taxicabs driven by an employee of said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API