Legal Opinion

Edgar v. Citraro

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. 7070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiffs, as the parents of Florence Edgar, a minor, brought this action to recover the damages they claimed to have sustained by reason of the injuries their daughter received in a collision between two automobiles driven respectively by the defendants Citraro and Pratt, which occurred at Fifth and Julian Streets in San Jose. The action was consolidated for trial with one brought by John Edgar, a minor, against the same parties and arising out of the same collision, and upon trial before a jury the plaintiffs herein were awarded a verdict against both defendants. The result of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Traylen v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Cook v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Berges v. GuthrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Edgar v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Flannery v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Edgar v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Edgar v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API