Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1939No. 28850PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal to reverse a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, and the trial court’s ruling on the motion for new trial. The parties appear in the same position as in the trial court, and we shall refer to them as plaintiff and defendant respectively.

The plaintiff and defendant made a week-end trip to Noel, Mo. On the return trip defendant’s car skidded in loose gravel on the highway and the right rear side of the car struck a bridge abutment, wrecking the car and causing injuries to the plaintiff, giving rise to this action for damages.

In her petition the plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Klein v. MuhlhausenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. HoukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Coston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Browne v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Athey v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Equels, Adm'x v. Tulsa City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API