Legal Opinion

United States v. One Gardner Roadster

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 12, 1929No. 12897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

The libel charges that the respondent was seized when therein was “possessed, deposited, concealed,, received and transported” some 13 grains of morphine which had been unlawfully imported without permit and payment of customs, duties, “and with intent to evade the payment, of said duties and to defraud the revenue of the United States.”

*778The claimant denies generally, and alleges it is the owner by virtue of the usual conditional sale to one Kenworthy who was in -possession of the auto when seized.

The evidence is that police, having probable cause to believe Kenworthy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  3. United States v. One 6-54-B Oakland Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1925
  4. United States v. One 1920 Premier AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1949 Pontiac SedanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. One 1952 Ford VictoriaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  3. United States v. One 1937 Hudson Terraplane Coupé Automobile, Motor No. 285062, Serial No. 701773District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API