Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1949 Pontiac Sedan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 21, 1952No. 10483_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from a judgment for claimant upon its libel seeking forfeiture of a 1949 Pontiac Sedan. The action, filed under 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 781-788, and 19 U.S.C.A. § 1615, was in two counts. The first charged that “the said Pontiac Sedan was used for the purpose of transportation, * * * of a contraband article, to wit, 40 tablets of morphine sulfate * * * not purchased in * * * or from the original stamped package as required by * * *” 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a). Count II, essentially the same, alleged that the morphine sulfate was contraband in that it had been…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  5. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1975 Mercedes 280SCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Associates Investment Company, Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Ted's Motors, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. One 1950 Buick Sedan, Serial No. 56272505Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API