Legal Opinion
United States v. One Chevrolet Coach
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 23, 1932No. 1820PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNERLY, District Judge.
This is a libel by the government under the Tariff Act (sections 482 and 483, of title 19, USCA) against, and to forfeit, one automobile (Chevrolet coach), seized November 17,1931, by a government narcotie agent, and by him delivered to the United States collector of customs at Houston. The car was seized while in the possession of one Meschi. He has 'not appeared to claim it, but General Motors Acceptance Corporation (defendant) has appeared, claiming a lien thereon. Trial by jury has been waived, and the parties have filed stipulation agreeing that they, upon the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Henderson's TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. One 1937 Hudson Terraplane Coupé Automobile, Motor No. 285062, Serial No. 701773District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
- Mosehart & Keller Automobile Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Thill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. One Studebaker AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1933