Legal Opinion

United States v. One 6-54-B Oakland Touring Automobile

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 6, 1925No. L-442PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

This libel invokes forfeiture of the respondent auto, for that in it were deposited, concealed, and transported from place to place in this state and year some 38 grains of cocaine theretofore unlawfully imported into this country and without payment of customs duty. The issues presented are clear and simple, viz.: (1) Whether there is any law warranting forfeiture; and (2) whether the ease is proven.

Adverting to the first, the general statutes of administration and collection in the matter of imports and duties provide for forfeiture of vehicles in circumstances like…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  3. United States v. SischoSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ted's Motors, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. One 1949 Pontiac SedanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. One 1937 Hudson Terraplane Coupé Automobile, Motor No. 285062, Serial No. 701773District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
  4. United States v. One Dodge SedanDistrict Court, D. California · 1928
  5. United States v. One Gardner RoadsterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API