Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1920 Premier Automobile

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1924No. 4116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Eastern District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Proceeding by the United States to forfeit and condemn one 1920 Premier automobile, in which J. E. Ashbroolc and another intervene. From an adverse judgment, the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The United States by information sought to forfeit and condemn one Premier automobile under section 3450, R. S. (Comp. St. § 6352). The owner of the automobile had been convicted and sentenced under an indictment charging him with violation of Act Dec. 17, 1914 (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q), in that he had in his possession cocaine without having registered with the collector of internal revenue and without having paid the special tax. At the time of the seizure of the automobile the owner was driving the same upon the streets of the city of Spokane, and had upon his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  3. United States v. One Gardner RoadsterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
  4. United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile, 1934 Model, Motor No. 18-1049806District Court, W.D. Texas · 1939
  5. United States v. MilstoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API