Legal Opinion

State v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1971No. 75PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

In the present condition of the record, the only question of law or legal inference presented is whether error of law appears upon the face of the record proper. State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E. 2d 203; Strong’s North Carolina Index, 2d, Vol. 3, Criminal Law, XII. Appeal and Error, § 146, p. 87. Careful review shows a valid indictment, the presence of the defendant before the court represented by counsel and a valid plea of guilty entered after extended inquiry. Error is neither shown nor suggested by anything that appears upon the face of the record. Ordinarily, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API