Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1972No. 15PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

We first consider defendant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to carry the case to the jury on the charge of kidnapping.

G.S. 14-39 does not define kidnapping and therefore the common-law definition of that crime is the law of this State. G.S. 4-1. The common-law definition of kidnapping is “the unláwful taking and carrying away of a person by force and against his will.” State v. Lowry, 263 N.C. 536, 139 S.E. 2d 870 (1964). The distance the victim is carried is not material. Any carrying away is sufficient. State v. Ingland, 278 N.C. 42, 178 S.E. 2d 577 (1971).…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API