Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1966No. 660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant having- entered said pleas of guilty, his appeal presents for review only whether error appears on the face of the record proper. S. v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800. The record on appeal contains one assignment of error, namely, that “(t)he sentences imposed by the court were excessive.” The assignment is without merit. The sentence in #21,728 is authorized by G.S. 14-22; and the sentence in #21,727 is authorized by G.S. 14-54. The court’s authority to provide that such sentences shall run consecutively is well established. 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law § 133. No…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TinsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. MostellerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. CleavesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API