Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2008No. 05CR1096, 05CR1097 A130813 (Control), A130936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals judgments imposing punitive sanctions for 11 counts of contempt of court, ORS 33.045, and conviction for one count of telephonic harassment, ORS 166.090. He contends that his waiver of counsel was invalid because the trial court did not adequately inform him of the risks of self-representation and that, as a result, his waiver was not made “knowingly.” We conclude that the trial court’s colloquy with defendant, together with a signed waiver form, demonstrate that he knowingly waived counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments imposing punitive sanctions of conviction.

Defend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. GainoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. EasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API