State v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Defendant appeals judgments imposing punitive sanctions for 11 counts of contempt of court, ORS 33.045, and conviction for one count of telephonic harassment, ORS 166.090. He contends that his waiver of counsel was invalid because the trial court did not adequately inform him of the risks of self-representation and that, as a result, his waiver was not made “knowingly.” We conclude that the trial court’s colloquy with defendant, together with a signed waiver form, demonstrate that he knowingly waived counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments imposing punitive sanctions of conviction.
Defend…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. GainoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. EasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.