Legal Opinion

Koller v. Schmaing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2012No. 050100598; A136633; 050100598; A139232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict in favor of Maureena Schmaing on her counterclaim for wrongful discharge against her employers, Daniel G. Koller, D.V.M., dba Companion Pet Clinic, NE 82nd Ave. (Koller), and Companion Pet Clinic of NE Portland, LLC (Pet Clinic).1 Although the procedural posture on appeal is, as we shall describe, convoluted, the parties’ dispute centers on issues which, as amplified below, we ultimately resolve as follows: (1) The only operative judgment, for purposes of our jurisdiction and review, is the original judgment, and not the third corrected general…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McManus v. AuchinclossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Johnson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API