Legal Opinion

Evans Ditch Co. v. Lakeside Ditch Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1910No. Civ. No. 649PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The Kaweah river, as stated by appellants, has its source in the Sierra Nevada mountains, in the eastern portion of Tulare county, and flows in a generally western direction to Tulare lake. At a point known as McKay point, where the stream emerges from the foothills, it divides into two branches, the southern one of which retains the name Kaweah and the northern one taking the name of ‘ ‘ St. Johns river.” Between these two streams there is also a natural- channel called Lane slough emptying into said Kaweah river. About the year 1877 an artificial channel or ditch was dug connecting St.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kellogg v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Taylor v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Village of Fairview v. Franklin Maple Creek Pioneer Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brandon v. Umpqua Lumber & Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. People v. YoutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API