Zilmer v. Gerichten
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County and from an order denying a new-trial. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover from the defendants the possession of a small piece of land containing two and a half acres, to which the plaintiff claims ownership and the right of possession. The defendants deny the alleged ownership and right of possession, and allege that they own the demanded premises and are rightfully in possession thereof.
At the close of the evidence on the part of plaintiff the defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit and their motion was granted. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, and contends that the court erred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Richardson v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lamont v. VingerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.