Legal Opinion

White v. Wheatland Irrigation District

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1966No. 3445PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Claiming to have acquired by prescription an easement for a water ditch across certain lands belonging to the defendants, the plaintiff commenced an action among other things to enjoin the defendants from interfering with the ditch as it traversed their lands. By their answer defendants denied that plaintiff had a ditch across their lands and also denied that plaintiff had acquired an easement for the ditch right of way. Alternatively, defendants denied that they had in any way interfered with the ditch. By way of counterclaims defendants sought to have title to their lands quieted as against…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. House v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  2. Scott v. WeinheimerMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Johnston v. Little Horse Creek Irrigating Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Sturgeon v. BrooksWyoming Supreme Court · 1955

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ely v. KirkWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gregory v. SandersWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stock v. RoeblingWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bard Ranch, Inc. v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API