People v. Youtz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Harriman, Ryckman & Tuttle, and Henry W. Nisbet, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George Beebe, Deputy Attorney- General, and Robert Mitchell, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant has appealed from a judgment of imprisonment entered upon his conviction of the crime described in section 564 of the Penal Code. Under the terms of the section noted, directors, officers, and agents of a corporation who concur in the making, publishing, or posting of reports or statements of the pecuniary condition of the corporation which are untrue or falsely exaggerated, are guilty of a felony. It was charged that appellant, while holding the position of director and acting vice-president of a certain corporation organized under the laws of California, published and concurred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Mabry v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Stewart v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Craig v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.