Franz v. Mendonca
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendant from obstructing his private way across the defendant’s land and for damages.
Upon the trial defendant had findings and judgment. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, his motion was granted, and the defendant appeals from the order granting said motion.
Plaintiff, in 1858, settled upon and entered a certain quarter section of government land situate in Washington township, county of Alameda, and in August, 1870, obtained a patent therefor. Subsequently, he acquired several 'other contiguous parcels> and plaintiff’s said lands in part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Cox v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- American Co. v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Matthiessen v. GrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.