Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Avila
California Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1917No. Sac. No. 2276PublishedCited by 14 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The plaintiff sued to establish and quiet title to her alleged right to maintain and use a water ditch extending from a branch of the main canal of the Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Company southerly through the land of the defendant to and over the land of plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff was the owner of the alleged easement through the lands of the defendant and gave judgment accordingly.
The facts involved can best be shown by a chronological statement. In the year 1903 plaintiff owned eighty acres of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Silva v. HawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Evans Ditch Co. v. Lakeside Ditch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Zanelli v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Silveira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Borden v. BoyvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.