Kaplan v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The dispositive question in this proceeding for writ of prohibition is whether the enactment of section 351 of the Evidence Code, declaring generally that “Except as otherwise provided by statute, all relevant evidence is admissible,” operated as a legislative repeal of the “vicarious exclusionary rule” adopted by this court in People v. Martin (1955) 45 Cal.2d 755 [290 P.2d 855], which permits a criminal defendant to object to the introduction of evidence illegally seized from a third person. We conclude the Legislature did not intend to repeal the Martin rule, and defendant…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. BrisendineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.