Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1971No. L. A. 29878PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The dispositive question in this proceeding for writ of prohibition is whether the enactment of section 351 of the Evidence Code, declaring generally that “Except as otherwise provided by statute, all relevant evidence is admissible,” operated as a legislative repeal of the “vicarious exclusionary rule” adopted by this court in People v. Martin (1955) 45 Cal.2d 755 [290 P.2d 855], which permits a criminal defendant to object to the introduction of evidence illegally seized from a third person. We conclude the Legislature did not intend to repeal the Martin rule, and defendant…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. BrisendineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API