Burk v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order denying a new trial. E. W. Wilson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. The suit was brought by a sister and two brothers of George W. Burk to recover damages for his death, which was caused by the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiffs are all adults, and the deceased at the time of his death was thirty-four years old. It was admitted that he was in good health, a competent and reliable locomotive engineer, in the receipt of monthly wages in the sum of seventy-five dollars, and.was well inured to his work. He had never been married and was boarding with one of his brothers immediately…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Earley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.