Legal Opinion

Ruggles Ex Rel. Estate of Mayer v. Grow

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1999No. S-7986PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is here for the second time. The historical and most of the procedural facts are set forth in our prior opinion, Grow v. *511Ruggles,1 We recite only the facts necessary to understand the issues in this appeal.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Carolyn Ruggles was injured in an automobile accident involving Monte Grow. Allstate Insurance Company insured both parties.2 Ruggles sued Grow, who was defended by Allstate. Allstate paid Ruggles’s medical expenses from the medical payments coverage of her policy.3 Allstate requested Rug-gles not to include…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Frederico Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd. And Djakarta Lloyd, P.N.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brinkerhoff v. Swearingen Aviation Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Grow v. RugglesAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Luther v. LanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Thomann v. FouseAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sidney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API