Legal Opinion

Grow v. Ruggles

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1993No. S-4994, 5035PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This case arises out of an automobile accident between Monte Grow and Carolyn Ruggles. The two issues presented for review are whether the superior court erred in denying Ruggles’ motion for a new trial and whether the superior court abused its discretion in awarding Ruggles attorney’s fees. We affirm the superior court’s denial of Ruggles’ motion for a new trial but reverse the attorney’s fees award.

In November 1987, Monte Grow drove his vehicle into the rear end of Carolyn Ruggles’ vehicle. Both Grow and Ruggles were insured by Allstate Insurance Company. Allstate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thomas D. Cundiff v. Virginia Lee WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kava v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Zok v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nelson v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API