Legal Opinion

Thomann v. Fouse

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2004No. S-10865PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Tara Thomann sued Seth Fouse for personal injuries arising from a car accident. Fouse unsuccessfully offered to settle the claim for $25,000 plus “medical payments assumed by [Fouse’s] insurance carrier for resolution in a subsequent arbitration.” A jury later returned a verdict resulting in an award that the superior court found to be lower than the pretrial offer. The court thus entered a judgment awarding post-offer costs and attorney’s fees to Fouse under Civil Rule 68. Because Fouse acknowledged below that the agreement for future arbitration…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Grow v. RugglesAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Myers v. Snow White Cleaners & Linen Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API