Thomann v. Fouse
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Tara Thomann sued Seth Fouse for personal injuries arising from a car accident. Fouse unsuccessfully offered to settle the claim for $25,000 plus “medical payments assumed by [Fouse’s] insurance carrier for resolution in a subsequent arbitration.” A jury later returned a verdict resulting in an award that the superior court found to be lower than the pretrial offer. The court thus entered a judgment awarding post-offer costs and attorney’s fees to Fouse under Civil Rule 68. Because Fouse acknowledged below that the agreement for future arbitration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Grow v. RugglesAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Myers v. Snow White Cleaners & Linen Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.