Legal Opinion

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2004No. S-10662, S-10696, S-10785PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this consolidated appeal 1 we address whether the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (the Consortium) can enforce a health care provider lien on settlement proceeds received by Alaska Native patients from third-party tortfeasors. If we determine that such a lien can be enforced, the principal question that follows is whether the lien must be reduced by a pro rata share of the patients’ attorney’s fees. These questions arise in two cases that share similar factual backgrounds. Each ease involves an Alaska Native who was treated as a patient at the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Parnell v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API