Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this consolidated appeal 1 we address whether the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (the Consortium) can enforce a health care provider lien on settlement proceeds received by Alaska Native patients from third-party tortfeasors. If we determine that such a lien can be enforced, the principal question that follows is whether the lien must be reduced by a pro rata share of the patients’ attorney’s fees. These questions arise in two cases that share similar factual backgrounds. Each ease involves an Alaska Native who was treated as a patient at the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CarpenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Parnell v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.