Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Blackwell
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2013No. 6771 S-14313PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Senior Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Dixie Dixon was injured in an automobile accident when a ear driven by Joshua Paul Blackwell ran a red light. She sued and received a verdict that was lower than Blackwell’s Alaska Civil Rule 68 offer of judgment. On appeal she challenges the adequacy of the verdict and the efficacy of the offer of judgment. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
Dixon was injured in an accident on February 14, 2006, as a result of being hit by a car driven by Blackwell. Blackwell admitted liability for the accident. Dixon received medical treatment for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weston v. AKHappytime, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Small v. SayreAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- GEICO Insurance v. BernheimSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Thomas J. Knolmayer, M.D., Alaska Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, LLC. v. Charina McCollum and Jason McCollumAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Nageak v. MallottAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.