Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This appeal presents a pure question of law: May an insurance company seek reimbursement for medical expenses paid to its insured under his policy when it also insures the tortfeasor and the insured brings an action against the tortfeasor seeking damages for the same medical expenses?
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
On February 6, 1991, Frederick Maynard and Glenn Madison were involved in an automobile accident. Both were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm).
State Farm paid Maynard’s medical bills totalling $5,212 pursuant to the Medical…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- GILBERT M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Alyssa B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Benge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.