Legal Opinion

Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1995No. S-6319PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal presents a pure question of law: May an insurance company seek reimbursement for medical expenses paid to its insured under his policy when it also insures the tortfeasor and the insured brings an action against the tortfeasor seeking damages for the same medical expenses?

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On February 6, 1991, Frederick Maynard and Glenn Madison were involved in an automobile accident. Both were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm).

State Farm paid Maynard’s medical bills totalling $5,212 pursuant to the Medical…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. GILBERT M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Alyssa B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Benge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API