People v. Grant
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
Penal Code section 288.5 1 provides that any person who resides with or has recurring access to a child under the age of fourteen, and who molests that child at least three times during a period of not less than three months, is guilty of “continuous sexual abuse,” a felony. When, as here, the sexual abuse begins before, but continues after, section 288.5’s effective date, does the abusive conduct fall within the statutory language? If so, can a conviction be affirmed under the statute without violating provisions in the state and federal Constitutions prohibiting ex post…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.