Legal Opinion

People v. Grant

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1999No. S057104PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Penal Code section 288.5 1 provides that any person who resides with or has recurring access to a child under the age of fourteen, and who molests that child at least three times during a period of not less than three months, is guilty of “continuous sexual abuse,” a felony. When, as here, the sexual abuse begins before, but continues after, section 288.5’s effective date, does the abusive conduct fall within the statutory language? If so, can a conviction be affirmed under the statute without violating provisions in the state and federal Constitutions prohibiting ex post…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API