California Department of Corrections v. Morales
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
In 1981, the State of California amended its parole procedures to allow the Board of Prison Terms to decrease the frequency of parole suitability hearings under certain circumstances. This case presents the question whether the application of this amendment to prisoners who committed *502their crimes before it was enacted violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. We conclude that it does not.
I
California twice has convicted respondent Jose Ramon Morales of murder. In 1971, the body of respondent’s girlfriend, Gina Wallace, was found in an abandoned medical building. She had been shot in the head, neck,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,003 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
998 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.