People v. Frazer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*742Opinion
BAXTER, J.
For many years, the Penal Code1 has contained statutes of limitation allowing prosecution of alleged child molesters within a fixed number of years after the crime was committed. (See, e.g., § 800.) Recently, the Legislature added section 803, subdivision (g) (section 803(g)), to the statutory scheme to permit prosecution of such crimes for an additional period—within one year of the time the victim reports an independently corroborated crime to law enforcement officials. By its own terms, the new one-year limitations period applies whether the crime occurred before or after…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. AnsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.