Legal Opinion

People v. Picklesimer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2010No. S165680PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1207 [39 Cal.Rptr.3d 821, 129 P.3d 29] {Hofsheier), we concluded imposition of mandatory lifetime sex offender registration on defendants convicted of violations of Penal Code section 288a, subdivision (b)(1) 1 for voluntary oral copulation with a 16- or 17-year-old minor violated the state and federal equal protection clauses. Our decision resulted in the creation of a class of people, those convicted of violating section 288a, subdivision (b)(1) on or before the date of our decision, who potentially might be entitled to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. GravinoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. In re CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API