Marketing Products Management, LLC v. Healthandbeautydirect. Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Marketing Products Management, LLC (“MPM”) and Christopher Lundin, have instituted two federal claims and numerous state law claims against Brian Fraidin and several of the entities Fraidin controls: Healthandbeautydi-reet.com, Inc. (“HBD”), Venture Cycle, LLC (‘Venture Cycle”), VI Holdings, Inc., DMSG Holdings, Inc. (“DMSG”), Venture Media Limited Partnership (‘Venture Media”), and Ventech, Inc: (‘Ventech”). Complete diversity of citizenship is absent. The two federal claims alleged by plaintiffs are said to arise under the Racketeer…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Biggs v. Eaglewood Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- HARDWIRE LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Mays & Associates, Inc. v. EulerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Onawola v. Johns Hopkins UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.