Legal Opinion
Mays & Associates, Inc. v. Euler
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 18, 2005No. CIV. RDB 05-437PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BENNETT, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is the Motion to Dismiss of the Defendants Robin and David Euler, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and pursuant to Rule
12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Also pending is Plaintiff Mays & Associates’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Amend its Complaint. This Court must first address Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as it challenges this Court’s jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Prunte v. Universal Music GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Cosmetic Ideas, Inc. v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- La Resolana Architects, PA v. Clay Realtors Angel FireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Walton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Vogel v. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.